Multidimensional Publicity
INFINITY SIPHON
AFFECTIVE CONCEPTUAL
INEFFABLE SUBLIMITY
SEMIOTIC PLAYGROUND
HEALING
PARANTHESES RESEARCH
DIGITAL AMORPHOUS
HTML OUTLAW
SELF-POSSESSION
MEDICINE BAG
BAREFOOT
CYBERPUNK MOODBOARD RAINBOW CYBERNETIC HOOD RAW TOOLBELT
RAINFOREST CHARCOAL
ECRU HEALING CRISIS ALKALINE STATE OF EMERGENCY CARDINAL FOUR NEOGRAPHISM DIFFERANCE ECUMENON
Deep Ecology. Abjection. Infrastructure. Equanimity. Pedagogical Entity. Meta-Theatrical. Transference. Complicity. Re-cognition. Re-sounding. Resonance. Reparations. Amelioration. Paranoia. Object. Memory. Temporality. Expansion. Channel. Criticality. Legibility. Sensibility. Bespoke. Plenary. Re-Cycle. Dissemination of perception Whose eyes are mine? Enchant Canon Recumbent CORPUS PEDAGOGE
Cybernetic access infinity coding One mass (ex) think-think Conscious procedure presentism Fictitious some-things, Uh-huh, yeh, understandings, Wishing, edifices crumble, Figment driven reality undertakes Hyperbolic no-thing di.visionary Drawing and photographic Sounds semblance word Semiotic liquid nod grappling. Circle shape eye cease operative Critic faculty admission probe Dalliance wide field earthen Metals smelt temporal vanity Credence salient closed nose Ocularcentric fickle waste-scape Acclimatising infinity’s infinite, Deconstruction and re.formation Distinguishing object/subject And individual identity offspring Artistic credibility sound face shape People creating despite ergo Nomen nasal re.cognise colour wilful Gratitude surfboard land-love Metallic rainbow seedhaus light glass Curve menace, minute bi second play Jewellery remnant cascade release .. x
Systems ; institution / (writing , language, translation recurrent , relational, planetary, nominal, Eistenstein montage Terms invented, situationists, dadists, derrida Critique of critique, or institutional critique, is a reflexive preponderance which may weave together the radical notions perceivable in these modernist texts, to our own experience, especially of, readership. Furthermore, a writing praxis which invokes institutional critique is engaging with its own form in a way often circumscribed to prowess and typologies. “The paranoid trust in exposure seemingly depends , in addition, on an infinite reservoir of naivete in those who make up the audience for these unveilings. What is the basis for assuming that it will surprise or disturb, never mind motivate, anyone to learn that a given social manifestation is artificial, self-contradictory, imitative, phantasmatic, or even violent?” (Sedgwick 139). “If there is an obvious danger in the triumphalism of a paranoid hermeneutics, it is that the broad consensual sweep of such methodological assumptions, the current near professionwide agreement about what constitutes narrative or explanation or adequate historicization may, if it persists unquestioned, unintentionally impoverish the gene pool of literary-critical perspectives and skills” (Sedgwick 143). “Does it matter when such projects misdescribe themselves or are misrecognized by readers? I wouldn’t suggest that the force of any powerful writing can ever attain complete transparency to itself, or is likely to account for itself very adequately at the constative level of the writing. But suppose one takes seriously the notion [...] that everyday theory qualitatively affects everyday knowledge and experience; and suppose that one doesn’t want to draw much ontological distinction between academic theory and everyday theory; and suppose that one has a lot of concern for the quality of other people’s and one’s own practices of knowing and experiencing. In these cases, it would make sense -- if one has the choice -- not to cultivate the necessity of a systematic, self-accelerating split between what one is doing and the reasons one is does it” (Sedgwick 144). “to read from a reparative position is to surrender the knowing, anxious paranoid determination that no horror, however apparently unthinkable, shall ever come to the reader as new; to a reparatively positioned reader, it can seem realistic and necessary to experience surprise. Because there can be terrible surprises, however, there can also be good ones. Hope, often a fracturing, even traumatic thing to experience, is among the energies by which the reparatively positioned reader tries to organize the fragments and part-objects she encounters or creates. Because the reader has room to realize that the future may be different from the present, it is also possible for her to entertain such profoundly painful, profoundly relieving, ethically crucial possibilities as that the past, in turn, could have happened differently from the way it actually did” (Sedgwick 146). “The desire of a reparative impulse, on the other hand, is additive and accretive. Its fear, a realistic one, is that the culture surrounding it is inadequate or inimical to its nurture; it wants to assemble and confer plenitude on an object that will then have resources to offer to an inchoate self” ((Sedgwick 149). “it is not people but mutable positions--or, I would want to say, practices--that can be divided between the paranoid and the reparative; it is sometimes the most paranoid-tending people who are able to, and need to, develop and disseminate the richest reparative practices” (Sedgwick 150). “The vocabulary for articulating any reader’s reparative motive toward a text or a culture has long been so sappy, aestheticizing, defensive, anti-intellectual, or reactionary that it’s no wonder few critics are willing to describe their acquaintance with such motives. The prohibitive problem, however, has been the limitations of present theoretical vocabularies rather than the repeartive motive itself. No less acute than than a paranoid position, no less realistic, no less attached to a project of survival, and neither less nor more delusional or fantasmic, the reparatie reading position undertakes a different range of affects, ambitions, and risks. What we can best learn from such practices are, perhaps, the many ways selves and communities succeed in extracting sustenance from the objects of a culture -- even of a culture whose avowed desire has often been not to sustain them” (Sedgwick 150-151). Limits of Critique “We mistake our object if we think of critique as consisting simply of series of propositions or intellectual arguments.” “thereby freeing up literary studies to embrace a wider range of affective styles and modes of argument” (Felski 3). “Why is critique such a charismatic mode of thought? Why is it so hard to get outside its orbit? To what extent does it rely on an implicit storyline? How does it orient the reader in spatial terms? In what ways does it constitute an overall intellectual mood or disposition? Such questions call for an approach that reads across texts as well as into texts, where phrases from an introductory textbook or primer can prove as revelatory as touchstone essays” (Felski 3). “To gauge the affective tone of scholarship, however, is not to spurn its substance but to face up to the obvious: modes of thought are also orientations toward the world that are infused with a certain attitude or disposition; arguments are a matter not only of content but of style and tone. In Sticking to the performance of such arguments, moreover, I intentionally refrain from peering into or diagnosing anyone’s state of mind” (Felski 4). “Everyday practices of teaching and writing and thinking span disparate activities and fluctuations of affect and tone.” “It somehow seems easier [...] to defend the value of literary study by asserting that it promotes critical reading or critical thinking” (Felski 4). “it seems increasingly evident that literary scholars are confusing a part of thought with the whole of thought, and that in doing so we are scanting a range of intellectual and expressive possibilities” (Felski 5). “Literary studies is currently facing a legitimation crisis, thanks to sadly depleted language of value that leaves us struggling to find reasons why students should care about Beowulf or Baudelaire” (Felski 5). “Rather than looking behind the text -- for its hidden causes, determining conditions, and noxious motives --- we might place ourselves in front of the text, reflecting on what it unfurls, calls forth, makes possible. This is not idealism, aestheticism, or magical thinking but a recognition--long overdue--of the text’s status as coactor: as something that makes a difference, that helps make things happen” (Felski 12). “The novelist has isolated himself. The birthplace of the novel is the solitary individual, who is no longer able to express himself by giving examples of his most important concerns, is himself uncounseled, and cannot counsel others. To write a novel means to carry the incommensureable to extremes in the representation of human life. In the midst of life’s fullness, and through the representation of this fullness, the novel gives evidence of the profound perplexity of the living” (Benjamin 87) “The cardinal point for the unaffected listener is to assure himself the possibility of reproducing the story” (Benjamin 97). “The deeper the remoteness which a glance has to overcome, the stronger will be the spell that is apt to emanate from that gaze. In eyes that look at us with a mirrorlike blankness the remoteness remains complete, It is precisely for this reason that such eyes know nothing of distance” (Benjamin 190) “During long periods of history, the mode of human sense perception changes with humanity’s entire mode of existence. The manner in which human sense perception is organized, the medium in which it is accomplished, is determined not only by nature but by historical circumstances as well” (Benjamin 222). “The Uniqueness of a work of art is inseparable from its being imbedded in the fabric of tradition. The tradition itself is thoroughly alive and extremely changeable” (Benjamin 223). Every fundamentally new, pioneering creation of demands will carry beyond its goal” (Benjamin 237).
surreptitious Neter Enki Ostentatious Wastrel Pejorative Leonor Fini Dorothea Tanning erogenous Aggregate Eponymous Asteracea Pathogen Adept repose Virtuoso Satcitananda simper riposte anthemic Quietude Trite caprice bonification Prima facie wabi-sabi Mono no-aware chatoyant Occident Shoal salient pastiche discursive Nepotism James Baldwin Stela Umbra penumbra Maverick Efficacy Supra ordinate Anachronism Quintessential Catachresis Chiasmus Antonomasia Stichomythia anaphoria Cataphoric Logorrhoea revile Epithet flotsam Confounded Conducive pataphysics polysemantic Telluric Bhuja Poiesis Canzona imitatio Kludge Detornement Odilon Redon Isa Genzken stringency draconian pontificate Pollard Parturition Exigency cumbersome picaresque Ostap Bender Sholem Aleichem Isaac babel Maqamah Ilf and petrov Gloria Anzaldua corpuscle Dactyl Dogoda geoglyph Eivar moya Polymorphous Diatribe Carny Augur Cybele Vestal Apotropaic Punic Aulos scholia apocryphon expiate alimentary equivocate Zofloya Spurious propitiation Fabulist Decollement Enantiodromia akrasia libation Desideratum petrology plutonism poultice Cataplasm Boswellia Meretrix bivalve Daidaia Mydriasis kensho Triphala kalonji Vacillate ephod pectoral raiment Sacerdotal Consilience Rahu Vasillate Appellation parataxis versimilitude Deference Pax Romana Hellenism Apotropaic Namburbi Antinous Denderah Sublimation Pallas-Athene nexus Pituitary Amygdala Noumenon Motya-Charioteer Daniela-Zekina vermillion Kleros Ousia Genesis Exodus Deutoronomy Numbers Leviticus Heiress horion Morion Oikos Kurios Despotes Kenton analogical Syzygy Hilajical Almuten zoidion adagium Tech Antonin-Artaud Vedanta Moksha Gestalt Word wyrd Patricia-A.McKillop Monads Aquila Antares Sublimation Novalis Nexus-Clarity Phoenix Elephantine Papyri Pohenician Etruscan Adrian-Piper Robert-Smithson Precipitation Clarice-Lispector Zarathustra Achernar Aldebaran Pharos Altair Arcturus Beta Centauri Betelgeuse Bungula Canopus Dioscuros Deneb Adige Fomalhaut Procyon Regulus Rigel Sirius Spica Vega Feoh Ur Thorn Os rad Wynn Haegl Nyd IS Ger EOH Peordh EOLH SIGIL TIR Beorc Mann Eh Lagu ING Daeg Ethel Ac Aesc Luminous Boondocks Schaharaszade Mauvais Newtonian Eve-Sedgwick Helene-Cixous Reparative Discernment Pataphysics Starhawk Eusbeia Bagua Qian Dui Li Zhen Xun kan Gen Kun Taiyang shaoyin shaoyang taiyon sixiang liangyu Taiji yin Yang Dukka mendicant
Andrei-Rublev Moirai Troubadour Typology Index Glossary diagnostics Meta-object Medallion Arizona-Dreams dreamweaver Ancora-Imparo Santana Palo-santo toilet-boys New-York-Dolls Name-of-the-Rose Ceramides Niacinamide Jojoba SkyBluu-L-Wensday Scooby-Doo-Solar-Plexus Innana Expansion Proselyte Matrix Matrices Bioforge Byzantium Gesamtkunstwerk Anomalie Enigma Socratic Lightwork Illumination Intuition Orion Eridanus Argo Cygnus Lyra Lunis-Major Interdisciplinary Praxis Salome Tyler-Henry Abraham-Hicks Frankincense Myrrh Faery Generative Prosaic Catalysis Transcendence Agression Attraction Lavender Rosemary Compassion Circe Dynamism Coexistence Daimon Eris Concatenation Phoneme Universal Predomninator Succeedent Cadent profection Chyma Skandha Ignotum-per-ignotius Cosmology Cosmogony Res-publica Wu-Zeitan D’Agnostino Force Field Sprouting Enveloping attending Arguing Leading Grouping Small-Harvest Treading Pervading Obstruction Concording-People Great-possessing Humbling Providing-for Following Correcting Nearing Viewing Gnawing-Bite Adorning Stripping Returning Innocence Great-Accumlating Swallowing Great-Exceeding Gorge Radiance Conjoining Perservering Retiring Great-Invigorating Prosepring Intelligence-Hidden Dwelling-People Polarising Limping Deliverance Diminisihing Augmenting Displacement Coupling Clustering Ascending Confining Welling Skinning Holding Shake Bound Infilitrating Convering-the-Maiden Abounding Sojourning Ground Open Dispersing Articulating Inner-Truth Small-Exceeding Already-fording Before-Completion Conjunction Opposition Sextile Trine Semi-Sextile Semi-Sesquadrate Backwoods Acre Neurosis Cockerel Asterism Cardinal Mutable Fixed Qualatative Quantative Rational Material Spiritual Immaterial Invisible Indivisable Inherent Essential Assuage Languid Poesis Midheaven Ascendent Imum-Coeli Sabian Persona Attitude Feedback Asteroid Luminary Chiron Reify Rectify Element Genre Theme Interdepence Epistemology Ontology Fecundity Earth-Sea Aether Sappho Transcription Friction Fiction Neo Lux Vox Agua-Viva Dialectic Cogito Funk Transmigration Paratext Metatext fastidious Mercurial Venusian Martian Jupiterian Uranian Neptunian Plutonian Spasmodic Fallacious Relational Relativity Quantum Magnitude Malleable Finette-Cendron Genesis-P.Oridge Demetra-George Stephen-Forrest Platonic Form Colour Shape Texture Taste Sweet Sour Astringent Warm Salty Bitter Kapha Vata Rahu Ketu Asinine Portent Bilingual Cryogenic pretense Pragmatism Dystopian Utopian Finnicky Fastidious Vertex Vehement Megalithic Monolithic Neolithic Archeo-Astronomical Figurative Metaphorical Trist Sanitise Prefix Syntax Assuage Braggdocio Pride Holism Culinary Herbological Botanical Phalanx Eccesiastic Cherbum Seraphim Narcissus Metatheurgical Demiurge Antichrist Theatrical Sanguine Reverie Disillusionment Pantheism Animism Monotheism Pastoral Palliative Ornaments Artifacts Aura Chakra Sahasrara Ajna Vishuddha Anihata Manipura Ecstasis Logos Phenomena Realism Surrealism Dada Impressionism Abstraction Minimalism Conceptual Feminist Rubric Cerebral Veterbrae Romance Reminiscence Retrograde Retroactive Anterograde Diminution Assiduous Acrimonious Accrid Acerbic Ascertain Alleviate Pre-suppose Presentism Dimensionality Eryka-Badu Amy-Winehouse Janis-Joplin Ana-Mendieta Azealia-Banks Cibo-Matto Antimonious Sirius Ceres Vesta Sol Luna Lingua Lacirate aquisition Stroke Fling Sycamore Byronic Fictitiois Imagineer Emancipate Immasculate Commemorate Commisarate Capitulate Tale Will Rhyme Ballad Multiplicity Diadem Remnant Surface Superficial Well-Spring Ornament Hue Tone Calligraphy Architecture Design Interrelated Endangered Undiscolsed Indistinguishable Appellation Seismic Scintillate Caravan Hydrogen Helium Cerberus medusa Oblong Tripartite Dialogue Disseminate Duuologue Chastise Jewellery Clay Constuction Deconstruction Falsity Brevity Semantic Morphology Microcosm Macrocosm Bi- Bio- Tri- Quad- Pentagram Decimal Fraction Conflate Confluence Cosmopolitan Aphrodisiac Extension Filament Finish phalanges limbic Circulatory Digestive Firmamanet Platinum Copper Steel Iron Magnesium Calcium Plutonium Aurora-Borealis Crustacean Animalia Plantae Archaia Inverterbrate horizon geode genteel gesticulate perambulate pertain pallate Inter- Intra- Increment Cement Brick Bottle Balance Foreboding Thrill Tunnel Cylender Pyramid Sphinx Riddle Innumerable Allocated fascism Communism Cantakerous Troll Gnome Elf Bison Horse Wolf Owl Wheel Sphere Cuboid Criminal Jurisprudence Geriatric Heal Systematic Shadow Charcoal Grey Lichen Lycanthrope Fossil Amber Amethyst Lapis-Lazuli Turquoise Azure Malachite Meridian Tropic Carribean Akkadian Minoan Minstrel Jasper Topaz Emerald Sapphire Ruby Gold Silver Lithium Straw Triad Triplicity Quadruplicity Artisan Pottery Vigilance Valkary Voluptious Curvature Appendage Akimbo Attainment Concernment Credibility Scientific Empirical Intrinsic Mitosis Meiosis Mitochondria Ribosome Nucleus Electron Neutron Proton Valium Paratheses Asterisk Percentile Exclamation Additional Subversie Subtraction Sympatico Similie Consummate Parable Pretext Process Cyclic Linear Pluralistic Multi-faceted Biota Fabric Rouge Event-Horizon Antithetical Anaggle-Toof Metatron Insight Insurmountable Engineer Noble Cryptogram puzzle Vortice Epigram Epilogue Choice Engagement Crystallise Operatic opportune Destiny Synchronicity appelation jocular Jovial Medea Remonstrance Remedy Remedios Recollect Relegate Monstrance Parfum Palette Palais Passageway Bookcase Cellar Door Reminisce Teff Fennel Utterance Relance Residual Relinquish Resonance Sonic Particulate Meander Annunciation Byzantium Bibliotecha sycamore celestial Syntax Syndoche Cerebellum Avarice Catalonia Providence Preeminent Figurative Mythopoiec Archive Decade Rosary Sidde Odyssey Alimony Farfetched Felicitous Apocryphal Eschatology Genuflection Mosaicist “Istoria” SPURIOUS Meretricious meretrix mercurial Plutonian saturnine phasganion xiphion Cataplasm acme Paragon Nadir Maracuja décoller Rue Mephitic Moulder Belie Assuage Fetlock Rondure Lucent Appenines recumbent Akrasia (the birds all chirped) Caduceus Ningishzida Apophis Ma’at Demuzid Inanna Naga Quetzalcoatl Nehushtan Iniquity Furtive Surreptitious Catharthis Verisimilitude Non sequitur Asyndeton Chiasmus Antimetabole Adage Onomatopoeia parataxis hypotaxis Pathetic fallacy Ad hominem Trochaic Zeugma Anadiplosis Seigneurial Adam Mickiewicz Genteel God is in things farther from him Flow of lower waters toward the upper Samsara = nirvana Transient = permanent Amor intellectualis dei kavannah = purity of intention Debekuk Eyn-Sof Ayin “The new world of the ruminant Cow” Presentiment Nefesh - soul body Ruah - Soul-cow, soul-soul Neshamah - soul-woman, soul-spirit, shekhinah-light Chaim SOutine “Zealous for sanctification” Śiva-śakti in their embrace union? Śiva, the perennial, undisturbed - passive! - serenity-repose, Śakti, the perennial energy of endless creativity, in union-embrace. Torero - bullfighter Congenial behooves apports Merkabah Trovar clus Perenial pathos Transitivity espoused xenophobia verbatim Intransigence Banal hegemony vestigial Aquiescsence benevolent Seigneurial Agrarian onus scrupulous artifice armature Bedoiur zenith castigation rectitude demagogue Taciturn Eidolon Abrogated Burgeoning abstruse plethora oeuvre antiquated untenable Chintzy propension incumbent Perfidy proclivity penchant messianic opus viscous multifarious megalomaniac ceded androgyn fusillade disconsolately daguerrotype bromide organdy viscose cordial complicity lathing temerity mulatto scapula Aqua regia muriatic corpulence balsa concupiscence virulent errant lugubrious casava hopper Chimerical stentorian seraphic Sappho caladium Coral Pernicious Proviso vicissitude Incantatory immemorial felicitous excursus constitutive anathema providential pundits volubility helot puerile haughty peradventure ethos caparisoned Modus Operandi ceteris paribus evinced pedant begonia sibyl Vulcan exodus expiate Caphtor median Anatolia Caucasus Pirouette Matvesicalesece hieratic estrei Svulare bubulare Patera tiamut fictitious prelude Premonition quell afferent Aleppo Marcador bandera San transliteration wanderer Heroine Covenant wolverine Myopia antebellum expropriation Script plunderphonic Unity secular Non sequitur Medicine Singularity Dodo Asimov Lispector Cymbal ester Amino Seneca Prosperina Rumi Persephone Decade Roscary Century Millenia Jurassic Paleolithic Pantomime Praxis Panacea Ganache Calliope Culpeper Credence Carlen Canopy Coscomoloph Cassowary Caddish Symphonic Ariel Vertigo Vertumnus Danube Derzhavin silicernium Putnam trutnvt emfepame Caerimonia Nebuchadnezzar domestication Snowk Spitfire Kreesal comeline Archaic Comparative Rosetta Pantagruel Zarathustra Adonis Earnest Chrysostom Hammurabi Cradle Delilah Garuda Isolde Malcreatiure Montsalvat Mithraic mimir Tanya Lapis Lazuli Kaamini Babylon Daniel Ethylene Grandiloquence Distraite Devant Tombes perdues Omi printemps vivant Engagererait raconte Vermeille Tailleur Poitrine Bague Aurais Perroquet Refl Ciseaux Partout Dystonie Inondation Mincz Gyula Mike Parr Blanka Dvorak Patricia March bifurcation Animando Humildes velada Atardecer valientes Solitarios amparaban Reproducia Follaje jorobadito Olvidaria Hablaba asesino Palangana Acorozada florero Estrechar Poetas Desolladas aforunado Aventuras Visage nommer promet anonyme benediction Tempetes muettement Voix remplissait Fuyance Chantait Plateaux rendait Ordinateur Wunderscon sentiment Tenebre Rayonnements personnages Surrender Stuperfaite enchevetrtparasol Exaltante gandouras semblant pyramide concoct Metamirs Agglomerate Indecipherable Mnemonic Execrate Memorioso narcosis Partigia tribunal Rhythmic Ramesses Voracious twilight Lunatic Electrocasnice
INTERVENTIONS
Audition Auditorium parallelism temptation termination trinum coagulate imperative sepulchre phoenician Austin canyon Menzana Mezunemusus horoskop beamtentitel determinism euphemism Labyrinthine metabos javelin apollonian novilara iguvium Genitive Prag puniciater Pretext Conjecturally Ellipsis Acrutu revestu Hieroglyphics bewilderment consitory overweening cartography Pneumatics amparo Jericho canic Featherd Primeval pendium planetarium bombard bombastic Hermeneutics engraved Illogical lateral Tranquiliser tachyon hysterical Phantasmagoria Retina aRabesque laputan Nautilus Equilateral extraterrestrial pobreza resumo Linea libro cercado Insoportablemente Voz levitando Luz Orfandad encontrada Jodida sacrificios parpardos Ciudad uscura cantado curiosidad flotabamos Homosexuales Frialdad vegetal rosadas Flash Forward Imagery Colloquialism Rhyme Onomatopoeia Ballad Homograph Satire Theme Pathos Genre Biography Cliffhanger Flashback Sonnet Analogy Allusion Assonance Alliteration Irony Anaphora Pun Juxtaposition Parallelism Conflict Comedy Voice Symbolism Tone Ambiguity Discourse Point of View Figurative Language Trope Prose Myth Protagonist Sibilance Ellipsis Poem Jargon Personification Synecdoche Cliché Internal Rhyme Dystopia Characterization Euphony Intertextuality Paradox Stanza Double Entendre Consonance Idiom Quatrain Aposiopesis Spondee Hook Kenning Parable Foreshadowing Homophone Hyperbole Allegory Climax Conceit Rising Action Ode Atmosphere Archetype Rhetorical Question Anadiplosis Syllogism Epitaph Catharsis Meter Farce Fable Euphemism Simile Inference Poetic Justice Drama Nemesis Semantic Extended Metaphor Metonymy Zeugma Haiku Motif Parody Antihero Bildungsroman Situational Irony Naturalism Denotation Syntax Apostrophe Inversion Half Rhyme
979742†Lukas†Zenisek Discussing†the†ambivalence†of†development in†Angels†in†America Lukas†Zenisek Functioning†as†a†discussion†of†Tony†Kushner’s†Angels†in†America¨†this essay†seeks†to†describe†many†facets†of†Angels¨†or†rather¨†the†way†in†which many†facets†are†portrayed†with†ambivalenceƆBy†observing†a†lineage†of†Paul Klee¨†Walter†Benjamin†and†Tony†Kushner¨†David†Savran†surmises†and explores†notions†of†“historical†materialism”†and†a†theoretical†progress†of influence†underpinning†Angels†Æ†Savran’s†notions†of†binary†couplets†and†the way†ambivalence†functions†to†erase†outcome†will†be†continually emphasised†Æ†The†comparative†portrayals†of†HumansØAngels¨†and†their corresponding†spatio≠temporal†contexts†will†be†one†dialectic†used†for contextualisation†in†discussing†progressØstasis†and†the†indeterminate direction†of†the†play†and†more†broadly¨†History†itselfƆThe†HarperØPrior prophetic†couplet†will†contextualise†a†human†being’s†subjective†sense†of 979742†Lukas†Zenisek totalityƆFinally¨†by†considering†how†the†play†exists†as†a†moment†in†History¨ the†barrier†between†mimesis†and†‘reality’†will†be†consideredÆ Ambivalence†can†be†considered†central†in†Angels†in†AmericaƆThis is†emphatically†discussed†by†David†Savran¨†who†articulates†the†way†multiple polarities†coexist†within†Angels¨†manifesting†uncertainty†in†conclusions typically†made†by†a†reader†or†audience†®212©Æ†Savran†specifies†“a†host†of binary†oppositions∫†heavenØhell¨†forgivenessØretribution¨ communitarianismØindividualism¨†spiritØflesh¨†pleasureØpain¨†beautyØdecay¨ futureØpast¨†homosexualityØheterosexuality¨†rationalismØindeterminacy¨ migrationØstaying†put¨†progressØstasis¨†lifeØdeath”†®212©Æ†These†polarities†are only†some¨†surmised¨†and†while†the†play†itself†exists†in†grey†area¨†the†focal point†is†constantly†oscillating†between†polaritiesƆThis†is†examplared†in†the microcosm¨†with†conversations†between†politically†opposing†characters†like Roy†and†Ethel¨†as†well†as†macro≠cosmically¨†where†the†spatio≠temporal locations†of†the†HeavenØEarth†and†the†differences†between†AngelsØHumans are†distinctƆWhile†oppositions†may†be†expected†to†create†climax†in narrative¨†Angels†harnesses†ambivalence†through†scenes†and†dialogue democratically¨†observed†in†the†frequency†of†Roy†Cohn’s†appaling†tyradesÆ Matthew†Wilson†Smith†articulates†similarly†to†Savran¨†identifying†the†text†as “profoundly†confused¨”†with†most†critics†pointing†to†its†“postmodern 979742†Lukas†Zenisek ambiguity”†®160©Æ†In†these†ways†Angels†exists†in†a†state†of†potentiality†®of outcome©Æ
While†Angels†is†concerned†with†development†¨†no†outcome†can†be ascertained†due†to†the†plot’s†oscillatory†ambivalenceƆSavran†identifies†the “teleological†process”†occurring†within†Angels†Æ†That†is¨†Kushner’s†concern with†development¨†of†a†progression†through†time¨†where†events†are†marked as†history¨†with†the†future†completely†ambiguousƆA†confusion†can†be†seen in†the†discussion†of†the†Angel†and†Prior†in†HeavenƆWhere†the†former describes†“Apocalypse†descending¨”†Prior†refuses†to†help†saying†“I†want more†life”†®Kushner†278©Æ†Seemingly†wanting†the†same†outcome†the†two parties†are†opposed¨†and†sensical†outcomes†are†unclearÆ The†theoretical†lineage†of†Angels†justifies†its†ambivalenceƆSavran identifies†Walter†“Benjaminßs†allegory†of†history”†as†“the†primary generative†fiction¨”†upon†Angels†®†Savran†211©†Æ†This†can†be†seen†in Kushner’s†admittance†that†the†name†Prior†Walter†was†derived†from Benjamin’s†own†name¨†establishing†a†kind†of†lineage†®Savran†212©Æ†One†of Benjamin’s†primary†focal†points¨†as†described†by†Savran¨†is†the†“Angel†of History¨”†the†interpretation†and†evocation†of†meaning†that†Benjamin†gains from†Paul†Klee’s†Angelus†Novus†®210©†Æ†Surmised¨†Benjamin†sees†in†this image†the†Angel†looking†back†upon†history†as†they†are†hurtled†into†the 979742†Lukas†Zenisek future¨†blind†®Savran†210©Æ†This†literary†inheritance†is†distinct†in†the†attitudes of†the†Angels†in†Kushner’s†play¨†as†they†are†desperate†for†Prior†to†establish “STASIS”†on†Earth¨†to†attract†God†home¨†establishing†order†®Kushner†174©Æ The†lineage†of†influence†of†Klee†to†Benjamin†to†Kushner†emphasises†this concept†of†material†history†in†which†the†publication†of†Angels†is†a†static event¨†occurring†through†a†theoretical†development†in†timeÆ Angels†exist†as†extra≠dimensional†Beings†who†operate†as†a subjectivity†and†point†of†comparison†to†humanityƆSavran†notes†the discrepancy†in†time†as†experienced†by†the†static†Angels†and†the†progressing Humans†®213©Æ†While†humans†are†potentially†moving†toward†and†spurning†a dystopian†or†utopian†reality¨†the†Angels†are†stuck†within†the†former¨ stagnantƆHeaven†represents†STASIS¨†the†Council†Room†strewn†with antiquated†devices†of†Earth¨†including†a†bulky†radio†dated†to†the†1940’s ®Savran†213©Æ†While†the†angels†are†intersex¨†God†is†specified†as†a†Man†as†he is†the†masculinised†“Aleph†Glyph”†®166©Æ†This†seems†to†infer†the†binary nature†of†gender†as†upheld†through†language¨†a†Symbolic†queue†which†is arguably†‘creative¨’†a†constructed†trait†of†humanityƆWhile†the†angels†have uniform†sexual†identities¨†they†copulate†constantly¨†and†while†they†lack creativity†individually¨†they†substantiate†all†creation†by†producing “protomatter¨”†or†“plasma†orgasmata¨”†copulating†with†God†®166©Æ Inherently¨†these†creatures†oppose†themselvesƆThey†wish†“STASIS”†and†an 979742†Lukas†Zenisek end†of†progress†upon†the†humans†so†that†God†may†return¨†therein†allowing copulation†and†their†own†version†of†creation¨†or†progress¨†to†continue ®Kushner†174©Æ†In†this†way†the†Angels†personify†ambivalence†as†they†wish stasis†on†others†to†escape†it†themselvesÆ Meaning†is†attributed†to†the†subjective†experienceƆWith†scope†of the†petulant†Angels†and†their†assumptions¨†the†HarperØPrior†prophetic couplet†embody†navigation†between†reality†and†fantasyƆBoth†have extra≠terrestrial†visions¨†in†dialogue†with†Beings†beyond†humanƆThey†see more†than†the†usual†confines†of†human†perception¨†and†their†worlds†even merge¨†literally†depicted†in†split†scenes†in†which†they†share†the†stageƆWithin the†plot¨†these†two†characters†have†been†left†by†Louis†and†Joe¨†who†end†up togetherƆThey†also†brought†together†by†Hannah¨†watching†Dummies†interact at†the†Mormon†Visitors†Centre†Diorama†Room¨†signifying†their†shared†gift of†sight†or†their†increased†Knowing†®Kushner†190©Æ†Their†truer†connection exists†in†the†immaterial†realm¨†where†“the†visions†that†Prior†and†Harper experience†together¨†and†the†“threshold†of†revelation”†that†they†share¨†are signposts†of†an†emergent¨†previously†unimaginable¨†web†of†connections” ®Smith†164©Æ†In†this†way†Angels†affords†its†defined†characters†a†value†in their†beliefsƆCrazed†impressions†are†blurred†with†truth≠seeking¨ relinquishing†an†element†of†prejudiceƆAs†human†prophets¨†these†two characters†speak†of†the†progress†which†re≠exhibits†the†human†conception†of 979742†Lukas†Zenisek timeƆPrior†says†to†the†angels¨†“motion…†is†modernityƆIt’s†animate¨†it’s what†living†things†doƆWe†desireƆEven†if†all†we†desire†is†stillness¨†it’s†still desire†for”†®Kushner†275©†Æ†For†Harper¨†the†net†of†souls†will†float†up†and repair†the†ozone¨†“Nothing’s†lost†foreverƆIn†this†world¨†there†is†a†kind†of painful†progressƆLonging†for†what†we’ve†left†behind¨†and†dreaming†aheadÆ At†least†I†think†that’s†so”†®Kushner†285©Æ†Harper†is†aware†of†subjectivism¨ that†the†net†is†her†way†of†conceptualising†totality¨†of†history†continuingƆYet within†the†ambivalent†context†of†Angels¨†these†hypotheses†become†versions of†truthÆ The†ambivalence†of†Angels†effects†the†performanceØreality†barrier within†a†theatrical†contextƆHarper’s†subjective†image†of†totality†presents one†version†of†truth¨†or†belief¨†or†reality†within†the†playƆBenjamin’s†notions of†Material†History†relates†to†the†audience’s†world¨†yet†are†harnessed†within Kushner’s†playƆThe†blurred†lines†of†truthful†experience†within†the†minds†of Harper†and†Prior†mirror†the†question∫†Is†the†play†mimetic†or†a†historical event†within†an†audiences†broader†realityƆAs†Smith†describes∫ “At†the†risk†of†oversimplification∫†in†Kushner’s†plays†the†political†is the†historical†i†s†the†drama†itselfª†we†witness¨†in†these†plays¨ individuals†and†groups†thrown†into†the†midst†of†history¨†arguing†the direction†of†the†tide†even†as†it†pulls†them†under†or†alongƆThere†are many†visions†of†history†in†Angels†in†America†ÆÆƆ”†®153© 979742†Lukas†Zenisek This†play¨†it’s†characters†and†its†dialogue¨†is†sprawlingƆThe†inclusion†of†Roy Cohn†and†Ethel†Rosenberg†as†‘real†people’†amongst†fictitious†characters†is an†element†which†intercepts†the†barrier†between†theatre†and†realityƆEthel herself†dictates†that†“®h©istory†is†about†to†crack†wide†open¨”†highlighting†the way†Angels†itself†wedges†between†so†many†dialectics†®Savran†212©Æ†Toying with†the†way†events†in†time†are†marked†as†static†within†a†fluid†continuum¨ how†theatre†is†considered†performance†compared†to†the†audience’s†queued behaviourÆ So¨†it†seems†necessary†that†this†discussion†of†Angels†should†be sprawled¨†confused†and†rhizomaticƆAngels†negotiates†between†so†many opposites¨†yet†exists†within†a†neutral†spaceƆIt†validates†fantasy†and†realism¨ where†totality†is†considered†in†one†woman’s†self≠aware†subjectivity†in†a world†that†moves†because†it†desires†to†moveƆHumans¨†looking†back¨ dreaming†forward¨†will†continually†create¨†and†whether†all†is†combusted¨†or streamlined¨†what†will†happen†will†happenƆThis†teleological†imperative¨†the notion†of†blind†development†towards†something†¨†drives†the†playÆ 979742†Lukas†Zenisek References Kushner¨†TonyƆAngels†In†America∫†A†Gay†Fantasia†on†National†ThemesƆNew†York∫†Theatre Communication†Group¨†2013Æ Savran¨†DavidƆ“Ambivalence¨†Utopia¨†and†a†Queer†Sort†of†Materialism∫†How†¢Angels†in†America¢ Reconstructs†the†NationÆ”†Theatre†Journal†47†®2©†®1995©∫†207≠227Æ Smith¨†Matthew†WilsonƆ“Angels†in†America∫†A†Progressive†ApocalypseÆ”†Theater†29†®3©†®1999©∫ 153–166Æ
CYBERNETIC†ACCESS†INFINITY†CODE†THEORY†Lukas†Zenisek Introductory†FRAGMENTARY†“Statements”†of†Cybernetic≠Infinity†∫ The†heat†made†IS†constantly†escapingÆ What†constructed†worlds†will†I†choose†to†live†within¨†what†rules†will†I†abide¨†what†lines†will I†traceÆ £linguistics†£etymologies†£≠ologies†£nomenclature†£subjectXobject†£spacetime Truth†is†fundamentally†opposed†and†unitedÆ Differentiation¨ Distinguishing†sensory†information¨ Which†as¨†animale™†¨†is†sixth†sense¨†1†seventh†senses¨ electro≠biological†sensory†awarenesses†≠science≠fiction≠presentistic≠reality†stylistic £life≠gripÆ The†screen†is†cultural†mode¨ many≠faceted†portal†to†information¨†experience¨†object≠subject†relations¨ subjectXobject†cyborgian†transcendentalism†“in†spacetime”Æ Collage¨ Fragments†noted Accessing†alike†torn†pages†from†a†bookÆ Living†in†their†science†fiction¨†in†genre†∫ The†logocentrism†of†academic†procedure†essentialises†Englishª†colonisationÆ …†or†what†that†could†mean†in†a†history†largely†written†by†Eurocentricised†rigidities¨ Who†chooses†publication¨ and†the†following†ideationsÆ Removal†of†tone†reduces†phonetic†spinÆ 1†Cixous¨†HeleneƆ“Coming†to†Writing”†and†Other†Essays†¨†Harvard†University†Press¨†1992Æ CYBERNETIC†ACCESS†INFINITY†CODE†THEORY†Lukas†Zenisek Tabs†on†a†computer†screenÆ Cords†attached†to†a†USB†dockÆ Multi≠directional†information†exchangeÆ Non≠anthropocentric†protagonistÆ Aesthetics†considered¨ Namedrop†Kafka™†2∫†labyrinthineÆ What†is†identificationÆ Simultaneously†existing†within†several†planesÆ Value¨ Everything†and†nothing†are†®could†be©†the†sameÆ Like†integers†1†and†≠1Æ Mycelium†network¨†concert¨ Inherent†interconnectednessÆ Art†supersedes†timeÆ Oral†HistoriesÆ Referents†could†include†the†bookcaseƆThe†InternetÆ An†account†with†content¨†patchwork†of†ideas†and†information¨†ocular¨†sonic¨†what†words are¨†read†and†spoken¨†even†when†read¨†re≠uttered†in†our†auditory†loopÆ The†Angel†of†History™3†is†hurtling†towards†a†finitude¨†Gonzo™4Æ 2†Kafka¨†FranzƆThe†Trial¨†Penguin¨†1925Æ 3†Kushner¨†TonyƆAngels†In†America∫†A†Gay†Fantasia†on†National†Themes¨†New†York∫†Theatre Communication†Group¨†2013Æ 4†Gonzo†Journalism CYBERNETIC†ACCESS†INFINITY†CODE†THEORY†Lukas†Zenisek argument My†argument†is†™Æ†I†will†argue†this†through†my†chosen†structures†that†is†the†shape†to which†the†words†will†take†as†paragraphs¨†built†of†statements¨†of†termsƆThese†statements will†make†points†and†display†ideas†and†methods†of†thinking†and†processing¨†circulating around†and†intersecting†the†content†of†the†Critical†Debates†Book†Æ™†The†parameters†of†a written†page†restrict†meÆ My†argument†is†a†shape†not†a†word¨†it’s†a†way†to†consider†multiple†considerationsÆ But†it†is†an†argument¨†it†is†my†argument†that†I†justify†through†textual†structures†implicit†in the†method†of†thinking†which†is†said†argumentƆParadoxologiesÆ The†written∫†documents¨†stratifies†≠†the†writing†is†the†edit†of†™¨†yet†the†writing†is†also†born anew¨†for†what†form†do†thoughts†truly†takeø ABSTRACT∫†“Essential†Prose”ss This†essay†has†been†scribed†in†the∫ CYBERNETIC†ACCESS†INFINITY†CODE†THEORY†School†of†Hermeneutics and†operates†as†the†coding’s†initial†linear†formulation¨†that†is¨†essay¨†which†has†been written†as†the†accumulative†output†of†the†English†and†Theatre†Studies†Capstone†Subject Critical†DebatesƆThis†formulation†seeksÆ It†occurs¨†it’s†presentedƆIt†acts¨†it†is†a†sublimationƆThe†Magician†of†the†Tarot™¨†the diplomat¨†the†transcriberƆA†vessel†that†is†poured†into†and†pours†outƆAquarius¨†age†ofø Measuring†a†whole†in†thimbles¨†in†spoonfulsÆƆto†a†parched†lipÆ To†write†is†to†present†terms†and†statements¨†when†your†pieces†are†words†and statements¨†and†not†written†in†something†else¨†something†I†cannot†writeÆ CYBERNETIC†ACCESS†INFINITY†CODE†THEORY†Lukas†Zenisek “Gospel”†came†to†mean†the†word†and†not†its†meaningƆPrescribed†codificationsÆ It’s†not†so†much†that†I†will†or†could†not†argue†for†one†truth†or†statement†so†much†as infinite†shapings†of†different†truths†which†coexist¨†but†to†write¨†I†require†statementsÆ It†materialises†in†enough†code†so†as†to†communicate†direct†ideasÆ But†in†saying¨†reflecting†on†Sergei†Eisenstein’s™†words†to†do†with†collage¨†the†magic happens†between†the†framesƆBetween†the†words¨†and†the†specified†contexts¨†lies something†unsaid¨†some†thing†that†can†be¨†to†you¨†to†one¨†to†many¨†something†perfect¨ perfect†in†imperfection¨†sure°†Whatever†IS†that†it∫ a©†wanted¨†or b©†didn’t†realise†it†was†processingª to†BE≠comeÆ David†Lynch™†talked†about†somewhere†in†a†book†I†read†that†he†would†do†transcendental meditation†and†visualise†1†red†1†blue†and†1†yellow†panes†individuated†by†empty†spacesÆ At†least†I†think†I†remember†him†saying†thatƆRegardless†in†thinking†of†communicating what†I†am¨†I†see†that†shape†and†I†think†of†that†moment¨†whether†it†happened†or†notƆAnd those†spaces†individuating†the†primary†colours†have†no†colour†but†they†are†experienced¨ even†visually¨†in†their†absence¨†framed†by†what†is†presented¨†tangible¨†written†in space≠time¨†to†be†readƆThe†point†here†is†that†the†causal≠links†of†perception¨†and therefore†the†way†understanding†is†made†through†communications¨†is†™Æ What†I†notice†is†that†I’ve†referenced†Eisenstein†and†Lynch†and†it’s†related†to†my canonical†learningsƆThat’s†OK†to†me¨†sure¨†but†you†know†it’s†this†way†the†Auteur CYBERNETIC†ACCESS†INFINITY†CODE†THEORY†Lukas†Zenisek becomes†a†brand†name¨†a†heading†for†“image≠music≠text”†to†be¨†And†yeah†Barthes™5†said the†Author†is†dead°†But†I†see†more†and†more†self≠branding¨†I’d†even†say†it’s†being†asked of†usƆThe†asking†is†more†in†the†form†of†social†expectation¨†or†in†social†~fluidityƆMaybe it’s†that†I†don’t†want†to†bring†attention†to†these†dudes†because†It†makes†me†unhappyø†It’s not†pleasurable†to†Obey†outdated†structures¨†yet†I†bear†witness†to†the†methods†and reruns†of†learning¨†that†have†formulated†my†present†instance¨†here¨†writingƆAnd†those Eisenstein†and†Lynch†paraphrases†are†some†words†that†stuck¨†a†shape†of†meaningÆ Lyotard™†discusses†in†The†Postmodern†Condition∫†a†Report†on†Knowledge†∫†language gamesÆ6†Organisations†of†grammar¨†of†structures¨†that†are†limitedƆThe†way†“each†of†the various†categories†of†utterance†can†be†defined†in†terms†of†rules†specifying†their properties†and†the†uses†to†which†they†can†be†put…†There†are†“rules”¨†straight≠sticks¨†that codify†prescriptionsÆ “Language†games”†was†coined†by†Wittgenstein†and†I†know†him†almost†personally†by watching†the†£queer†Derek†Jarman™†film¨†Wittgenstein†®1993©Æ†Knowing†really†is†a basket≠caseÆ Infinite†varietyƆLinkingƆRelationshipsÆ The†intention†of†a†reading†praxis†biding†pedagogical†standards†to†minimise†found knowledge†is†mirrored†in†minimalist†tendenciesÆ The†role†of†opinions¨†of†affect†and†effectƆI†was†taught†not†to†say†“I†relate†to†Jane†Eyre”™ but†rather†“I†identify†with†Jane†Eyre¨”†because†“relatable”†doesn’t†make†sense¨†make grammar¨†or†grammar†didn’t†formally†construct¨†“relatable¨”†or†what†it†had†come†to†mean¨ 5†Barthes¨†RolandƆImage≠Music≠TextƆFontana†Press¨†1979¨ 6†Lyotard¨†Jean≠FrancoisƆThe†Postmodern†Condition∫†a†Report†on†KnowledgeƆUniversity†of Minnesota†Press¨†1979Æ CYBERNETIC†ACCESS†INFINITY†CODE†THEORY†Lukas†Zenisek in†typified†phrase¨†through†the†live†evolution†of†language¨†of†culture¨†of†human¨†in†the†new milleniumÆ Lyotard†says†“The†University†is†sick”†and†I†agree†and†I†wanted†to†quote†that†since reading†itƆAnd†here†it†isƆAnd†I†think†it’s†not†just†the†university†but†societyƆSociety†is sickø†What†is†sickÆ I†didn’t†want†a†question†mark†thereÆ Everything†could†be†perceived†as†it†is†what†it†is†¨†and†is†perceived†like†that¨†whilst†holding other†perceptions†of†what†“is¨”†and†how†things†“are¨”†as†one†individually†weighs†up†the constant†speculative†generosities†of†the†world†which†can†floodÆ Lyotard†describes†the†pleasure†derived†from†the†“endless†invention†of†turns†of†phrase¨†of words†and†meanings¨”†from†the†vantage†of†a†general†“agonistics”Ɔ7†Lyotard†describes ®rhi©zhomes†of†game†logic¨†precursor†to†video†game†logicØs¨†precursors†of†virtual†reality¨ screen†worlds†and†perceptions†merging†closer¨†new≠physics¨†human†and†machine†uniting more†whollyƆIn†“endless†invention”†we†recount†the†infinite†statements¨†in†the digitalisation†we†behold†the†cyberneticƆHence†CYBERNETIC†ACCESS†INFINITY†CODE THEORYÆ 7†IbidÆ CYBERNETIC†ACCESS†INFINITY†CODE†THEORY†Lukas†Zenisek The†book†case Statement∫†The†Book†case†is†an†interface†enacting†intertextualityÆ Typified¨†spatially†accessible†and†while†not†cyber†¨†analog†interrelations†compared†to†the distinct†Cybernetic†Infinity†of†the†Internet≠Interface†Access†that†many†humans†operate aroundÆ Structural†similarities†in†that†the†libraryª†the†books¨†enact†interchangeable†pathways†that the†internet†and†hyperlinks†have†naturalisedƆBooks†can†be†considered†wholes†to†be readƆBy†tracing†transtextual†adaptive†lineages†through†implicit†and†explicit†connexions made†in†text†®books†and†other†readable†media¨†cultural†artefacts¨†perceived phenomena©¨†constant†causal†links†have†been†and†can†be†drawnÆ Within†the†pedagogy¨†the†requirements†for†this†here†essay¨†books†are†fine†to†splice¨†to take†fractions†of†a†whole†and†rearrange¨†reformulateƆWe†are†gathering†materials¨ weaving†intertextuality¨†transtextualityÆ Critical†Debates†is†a†bookƆThe†Critical†Debates†readings†were†printed†and†boundƆThey exist†formally¨†physically¨†They†hold†in†the†the†potential†of†reading†Sedgwick¨†Derrida¨ Butler¨†etcƆYou†can†flip†open†the†textbook†and†close†read†a†page¨†a†sentence¨†and†map out†vortices†of†meaning†that†interrelates†you¨†your†context¨†and†the†words†of†a†distinct academicƆThe†commonalities†lie†in†the†precedence†of†logos¨†of†traditional linguistic≠communication¨†even†in†deconstructing†the†clarity¨†or†validity¨†or†objectivityª†of said†communicationsÆ CYBERNETIC†ACCESS†INFINITY†CODE†THEORY†Lukas†Zenisek Modus†operandi There†are†forms†enacted†to†confer¨†to†convergeƆTo†limit†what†is†perceptible†at†onceÆ Ideation¨†aØn†imØperceptible†structureØs†to†diØvide†everyØthingƆFractionated†reductionism as†necessary†to†form†a†common†sense†that†can†be†downloaded†easily¨†raised†in†your home†you†learn†the†world†and†then†you†enact†your†teachingsƆYou†becomeÆ Really†there†are†far†more†choices†than†perhaps†we†consider†in†how†we†hold†ourselves¨†in what†we†write¨†in†why†we†doƆSuch†a†trickle†down†of†acceptable†coding†that†even†in†our rebellion†we†clamber†to†foundationsƆCommunications¨†typically¨†is†an†adherence†to†the agreed†nature†of†communicationƆTo†affect†that†is†to†affect†the†ease†of†understanding¨ but†in†abstraction†comes†something…†A†space¨†to…†guessø†To†imagineƆIf†responses were†not†automatically†derisive¨†reductive¨†we†could†all†stare†in†wonder†at†each†others†… …†parts†of†the†potential†entirety†as†infinity†what†if†some†author conceptualised†a†“physical”†®material©†æperceptible†Decal¨†that†is†… The†way†that†an†individual†contains†both†“common†sense”†and†personal†sense†as evolving†in†this†rhizome†exchangeƆThat†being†a†constant†download†and†access†to cybernetic†pathways¨†of†extending†neuronal†significance†into†portals†made†of†glass¨ plasticƆInvisible¨†opaque¨†murky†water†acts†like†a†sun†and†shines†onto†us¨†light†energy¨ thermodynamically¨†pictorially¨†symbolically†reiterating†commonsensical†modes†of operation¨†of†understandingƆThings†have†been†conceived¨†enshrined†and†reproduced¨†in sentiment†and†in†that†which†is†perceptibleƆThings†can†be†readƆThings†are†readƆWithin†a CYBERNETIC†ACCESS†INFINITY†CODE†THEORY†Lukas†Zenisek literary†context¨†this†literal†context¨†written†here†in†English¨†we†are†considering†reading inherently¨†as†formalised†with†a†DictionaryƆAs†defining†reading†as†a†praxis†within†a†book that†fundamentalises†reading¨†a†book†holding†words†with†their†meanings†written†in†words which†have†meanings¨†and†there†are†page†numbersƆAnd†a†book†ends¨†and†is†bound†by a†cover¨†usuallyƆThese†are†readƆThese†are†texts†made†of†text¨†plurals†made†of singularsƆBuilding†blocksƆAtomic†linguistic†structures¨†different†curved†linesƆCyrillic†in this†caseƆAs†evolved†from†previous†systems¨†methods¨†modes†of†operating†humanly common†senses†and†individuated†beliefs†that†still†function†based†in†learned†social behavioural†contextsƆCulture¨†some†differentiations†entrenched†by†geoØpolitical borderØlines…†EnØhanced†by†the†proØgress¨†the†proØcess¨†of†causØality¨†causØation¨ continuation†of†AllƆOften†considered†linguistically¨†in†turn†of†phrase¨†as¨†“in†timeÆ” Many†sentiments†have†entered†common†sense¨†by†my†notice¨†that†“time†doesn’t†even existÆ”†There’s†a†lot†that†could†be†said†about†memes†now¨†necessitating†more†than†logos¨ in†cybernetic†realms¨†modes†operating†around†interfaces†such†as†laptop†computers†with QWERTY†keyboards¨†mobile†phones†“of†courseÆ”†Those†are†usually†touch†screen†at†the moment¨†Sunday†5∫35pm†28th†October†2018Æ Homages†to†poetry†or†homages†to†reasonª†grammarƆHomages†to†sense†or†nonsenseÆ Grammatical†sense¨†common†sense†∫†languageƆTo†make†sense†“I”†need†to†hold†to†the commonsensical†linguistic†structuresƆBy†breaking†with†sense†more¨†with†reason¨ typification¨†I†cause†alienation¨†ad≠libitum¨†ad≠lib¨†ad†freedom†ø But†if†sense†is†broken†with†too†much¨†there†is†no†communicationÆ Is†this†abstract¨†absurdƆIts†AbƆAbsolutely†AB†when†sense†is†broken†too†muchƆWhether AB´†or†AB≠†are†the†rarest†blood†types¨†was†that†biologically¨†linguistically¨†OR CYBERNETIC†ACCESS†INFINITY†CODE†THEORY†Lukas†Zenisek historicallyø†I’ve†forgotten†which†≠Ology¨†which†‘field†of†study’†I†should†orientate†my analytic†truth≠seeking†around†to†assimilate†with†its†modal†proceduresÆ These†are†internalised¨†hidden≠from≠the≠sun¨†kind†of†mentalities¨†rigiditiesƆContextsƆCon textƆWith†textƆA†text†being†an†“object†that†can†be†readÆ”†The†structural†armatures†that define†how†we†¶†we†are†read¨†can†¶†can†be†read¨†subjectXobjectÆ I¨†than¨†value†Intentionally†clouding†sense¨†so†as†to†Function†against†the†rationale†with smoke†and†mirrorsƆBecause†that†is†a†position†in†itself†and†it†argues¨†and†contends against†normsÆÆƆflourishing¨†cornucopia¨†Samhain†glorious†red†mood†tidal†frequencies¨ solar†shiftsƆThe†raw†phenomena†supersedes†the†antiquated†ramblings†of†critical†thoughtÆ When†you†see†that†you†can’t†really†know†what†they†mean†when†they†say†that¨†the ideation†of†wide†reading†seems†confused¨†all†understanding†filtered†through subjectXobjectƆSpecified†more†in†written¨†in†History¨†so†as†to†freezeÆ To†imbue†Syllabus¨†repeat†utterance†of†Auteur†within†an†≠OlogyÆ Post†critique Where†do†lines†of†anecdote†and†individualism†get†drawnƆThey†don’t†need†toƆThe†School of†Clarice†Lispector™†Æ†If†Helene†Cixous™†didn’t†clarify†¨†enamoured†by†8†her†style¨†then†it was†Sedgwick™9†who†cemented†IT†Æ†That†I†can†exist†in†my†output¨†in†my†words¨†and†that†I shouldn’t†be†paranoid†about†stylistic†errorsƆReally†Errors†at†allƆI†seek†reparative†ends¨†I enact†reparative†praxisƆI†write†in†the†face†of†the†OligarchyƆI†feel†defiance†in†my†blood¨ body†and†boneƆI†feel†that†writing†is†actionƆI†feel†that†“my†education”†means†something¨ 8†Cixous†1991¨†34Æ 9†Sedgwick¨†Eve†KosofskyƆTouching†FeelingƆDuke†University†Press¨†2003Æ CYBERNETIC†ACCESS†INFINITY†CODE†THEORY†Lukas†Zenisek my†meaning†can†expand†beyond†anythingƆAcknowledging†a†sheer†volume†of†poetical veracity†is†acknowledging†the†expanses†of†knowledge¨†the†potential†knowingsƆThe methodological†processes†of†reaching†knowledgeƆI†agree†with†Sedgwick¨†and†her articulation†of†the†Paranoid†impulse¨†the†paranoid†readingƆIt’s†apparent†10†to†me¨†the taught†reductionism¨†the†desperation†of†the†academic†to†make†sense¨†to†codify†thoughts into†the†academic†milieuƆBut†what†of†Complete†blur†of†critique†and†anecdote¨†or†of prose¨†andØor†poetical†arabesqueø†Critique†is†constantƆConsideration†is†constantƆTexts are†constant¨†that†is†to†say¨†our†engagement†with†them¨†is†constantƆStreet†signs¨†so clearly†signifiers¨†signs¨†often†pictorialƆPictorial°†Images†use†language¨†music¨†they†are language¨†they†can†be†languageƆGrammatically†a†choice†of†word†can†create†such definitionƆA†word†can†pin†and†what†if†it†is†pinned†in†the†wrong†place¨†what†if†you†aren’t†to say†you†know†where†it†should†go¨†or†that†the†place†it†should†go¨†is†many†placesÆ The†opinions†of†others†to†whom†I’ve†read†just†come†to†me¨†their†motives†swirl†inside†me¨ at†least†in†my†understanding†or†thoughts†of†them¨†like†a†character†or†person†or†an≠other offering†something†to†understandƆFrom†ourselves†tooƆThey†speak†through†time†and space†with†their†words¨†aptly†chosen¨†authors¨†as†do†other†people¨†perhaps†us†all¨†in†our own†ways¨†leaving†our†traces¨†breadcrumbs†to†be†found†by†those†who†wish†to†find†usÆ ™Adrian†Piper¨†A†108†®KANT©†£1≠6 ™†https∫ØØwwwÆyoutubeÆcomØwatchøvΩk2NFhiIaUa0 10†IbidÆ CYBERNETIC†ACCESS†INFINITY†CODE†THEORY†Lukas†Zenisek Really†I†love†Cixous†and†Sedgwick†because†I†could†hear†them†in†the†darkƆClarice offered†me†another†heart†to†pump†outside†of†my†body¨†to†pair†me†with†my†surroundings¨ to†let†me†fade†awayƆMazzy†Star’s™†“Into†Dust”†plays¨†the†album†cover†11†says†something to†me¨†a†countenanceƆWaiting†for†a†bus†and†it’s†raining†but†you†stand†outside†the†shelter anywayƆI†don’t†mindÆ What†is†sentiment¨†and†what†is†the†pleasure†in†the†feeling≠of†feelingƆI†find†dancing†can communicate†a†folded†feeling¨†to†feel†a†communication†springƆ“Everyoneßs†different¨” maintained†robotic†prowesses¨†poisesƆWe’re†all†operating†styles¨†unbeknownst¨ life≠stylesÆ How†our†lives†function¨†materially†and†not¨†in†time†and†notƆIn†space†and†notÆ Searching†for†justification†and†referencing†IS†Ø†can†be†a†different†process†then†mapping what†has†already†entered†your†mind†at†the†moment†of†written†conceptionƆThat†the†latter acts†as†state†of†stream†of†consciousness¨†where†the†mind†marks†itself¨†its†thoughts¨†how they†seem†to†formƆI†believe†this†to†be†generous†and†more†personable¨†than†more distanced†turn†of†phrase¨†that†seeks†demystificationÆ In†ways†what†I’m†advocating†is†offering†nodes†without†their†exacerbation¨†suggesting individuated†elements¨†names¨†phrases¨†and†sequencing†themƆIn†a†way†this†is†not†ideal because†all†denotations†restrict¨†but†to†communicate†requires†signifiers†which†are†to†be manifest¨†like†the†body†is†to†the†mind¨†words†to†a†word†countƆCreating†sentences†made from†songs¨†screenshots¨†images¨†words…†pieces¨†chosenƆScreenshots†choose moments¨†sectionsƆThey†crop¨†the†crop†becomes†the†critique¨†becomes†the†focalisationÆ 11†https∫ØØwwwÆyoutubeÆcomØwatchøvΩSiOfl7LhPZFM CYBERNETIC†ACCESS†INFINITY†CODE†THEORY†Lukas†Zenisek The†stringing†of†notes†becomes†a†language¨†becomes†an†aesthetic¨†audio≠visual experiential†communicative†potentialityƆCybernetic†Infinity¨†Codes†to†Access¨†to TheoriseÆ The†prime†meridian†is†an†androgynous†locusÆ 2704†wordsÆ References Cixous¨†HeleneƆ“Coming†to†Writing”†and†Other†Essays†Æ†Harvard†University†Press¨†1992Æ Kafka¨†FranzƆThe†Trial¨†Penguin¨†1925Æ Kushner¨†TonyƆAngels†In†America∫†A†Gay†Fantasia†on†National†Themes¨†New†York∫†Theatre Communication†Group¨†2013Æ Lyotard¨†Jean≠FrancoisƆThe†Postmodern†Condition∫†a†Report†on†KnowledgeƆUniversity†of Minnesota†Press¨†1979Æ Piper¨†AdrianƆA†108†©KANT®†£1≠6 Star¨†MazzyƆInto†DustƆhttps∫ØØwwwÆyoutubeÆcomØwatchøvΩSiOfl7LhPZFM Sedgwick¨†Eve†KosofskyƆTouching†FeelingƆDuke†University†Press¨†2003Æ
On meeting the patient a large pool of information was gathered, detailing the potential factors of disturbance which were hampering his vitality and health. By addressing the patient’s constitution, removing obstacles and stimulating the Vis Medicatrix Naturae, a naturopathic approach has been taken. Remedies and therapy that follow the therapeutic order have been suggested in hopes of achieving a normal and harmonious equilibrium, reducing the chronic pain and suffering previously felt. Approach In considering the patient’s state of health, I consider Primum Non Nocere, or, First, do no harm. This approach involves working with the natural reactions of the Vis Medicatrix Naturae, in harmony with the intelligent wisdom of the vital force. To encourage health in overcoming disease, it is important to introduce remedies that pose minimum risk. Considering Tolle Causam, illness occurs causally. It follows that as the factors that disturb health are removed, medicines and therapies should support self-healing processes. In this way, symptoms that arise as the body processes change (which may involve acute illness and discharge) should not be suppressed, as this may only mask the root cause of disease. Therefore, paying close attention to the brevity of symptoms helps paint a complete picture of the individual present for treatment. Each varied detail of the patient’s lifestyle assists this holistic approach, tailoring an ideal course of treatment, perhaps locating the centre of gravity and working towards a harmonious state of health. Factors of Disease The patient has a varied history of illness. He has suffered from bouts of bronchitis frequently in his life, which appear an acute reaction, likely in response to heavy smoking. As he has quit several times, it could be the case that the bronchitis develops during a discharge process, inflaming with severity, but abating. Meanwhile, the patient is suffering long term from symptoms of Multiple Sclerosis. These conditions have been present for five years, and appear to be chronic. This is noted due to the inability for the system and its vital force to react sufficiently on its own, likely due to the cumulative disturbances affecting vitality over his life. The severity of this illness seems to be the centre of gravity for the patient, which must be addressed. The patient’s lifestyle seems to have a wide variety of potential factors of disturbance. Before coming to the first consultation he had already reduced the intake of sugary sodas and coffee. However, his diet was still largely comprised of packaged and processed foods. It could be said that this kind of diet, common in today’s society, would align with Lindlahrs’ noted cause of disease; the accumulation of waste and poisons in the system. The extent of sugary drinks, alcohol and smoking the patient undertook would all be creating toxic build-ups. Due to the patient’s extensive pain he does not exercise regularly. This, along with other factors, may be part of the reason for the lowered vitality, another cause of disease as suggested by Lindlahr. Abnormal composition of blood and lymph, the third cause of disease, may well be influenced by his smoking, drinking, exposure to toxic materials, but also the wide variety of medications he had been consuming in an attempt to remedy his pain. All of these substances creating biochemical reactions affect the system’s ability to function harmonically. Treatment In attending to the patient a varied course of restorative practices were suggested and employed to move towards self-healing. These constitutional medicines follow the Naturopathic Therapeutic order, as detailed. By first establishing the conditions of health, the disturbing factors should stay removed. Then creating a new healthy regime that includes an Anti-inflammatory Diet with the removal of artificial sweeteners (that may directly affect the patient’s MS). This regime includes the increased water intake of 3 litres daily. The suggestion of B-complex, Vitamin D and Omega-3 supplements could also be considered factors for establishing healthy internal conditions, by attending to dietetic deficiencies. Natrum muriaticum 30C, taken daily, also becomes part of this healthful regime, and a method for specifically stimulating of the Vis Medicatrix Naturae, along with the weekly Acupuncture treatment, which may activate energy centres. The Herbal tincture recommended at the second visitation, proceeds to tonify weakened systems in the body, such as the kidneys and liver. Also suggested at this second visit, is chiropractic treatment that may correct structural integrity, in hopes of positively affecting the symptoms of MS. At the patients third visitation, it is evident he has been experiencing a mode of healing crisis, with distinct discharge in the form of white and yellow sputum, headaches, and other reactions. After two days there is only a fever and a cough remaining. Both of these acute illnesses are signs of the systems natural inflammatory reactions, and show a process of recovery towards Health. So, by reviewing this case study we can see many aspects of Naturopathic philosophy enacted. By approaching the patient as a unique individual with a history of varied illnesses and factors for disease, we create a detailed approach to assist him in self-healing. The harmonious and healthful way the patient’s system can operate still exists, and the naturopathic approach allows for these healing conditions to resurface. By removing the obstacles, creating healthier patterns, and employing treatments that tonify and strengthen the patient, whilst posing minimum risks, we can see the evidence of the Vis Medicatrix Naturae, or vital force, re-established in the patient, moving through reactionary phases and expelling toxic compounds. With this continual care and awareness, the patient moves towards health and vitality.
